Grass-fed and finished quarter beef bundles are here! Get yours now.

Sure, flour makes good food. But can it be good for you, too?

written by

Michelle Sroka

posted on

October 6, 2022

Do you think flour has any nutritional value?

If I had to answer honestly, I'd probably say that most of what people in our country eat - highly processed, refined white flour - does not. This would be based on what I know about white flour: that it's often bleached; that it's stripped of its vitamins and minerals; and that it's linked to health problems and disease. And most of it is not organic, so we're ingesting pesticide residue.

That, at least, is the narrative when it comes to refined white flour - 99.9% of what we encounter in the store or the bread products that we eat. But has flour always been this way? Are their other alternatives?

You probably have a friend or family member (or maybe it's even you!) that eats bread that looks radically different from what we usually encounter. It's probably brown and full of various seeds. It likely has a more bitter, and less sweet, taste than conventional bread. It's probably tougher (and maybe someone has made a snarky comment comparing it to cardboard). You can likely find it at small bakeries or from local bakers, or maybe you even make it yourself.

Where does this type of bread come from?

Flour derives, as you probably know, from a wheat plant - specifically, the wheat berry. These berries are what we use when we make flour, and they're also where the nutritional value of wheat lies.

Refined flour processes berries into flour by removing the hard outer shell (the bran) and the wheat germ (part of the wheat kernel or seed). Then, the remainder is processed into the very fine flour we're familiar with. Although it results in a consistency and quality that produces desirable results, it also has no minerals or vitamins. These were removed when the shell and germ were stripped.

Whole grain flour, on the other hand, is milled from intact, unprocessed wheat grains, kernels, and seeds. This preserves the nutrition of the flour. But it can often be dense to bake with, and difficult to digest, or to absorb the nutrients into our bodies.

Biologically, this makes sense - the hard bran shell is meant to protect the seed to preserve the life of the plant. But it also can make it difficult when we're trying to cook with it.

Luckily, there's a middle ground - soaking the grains and sprouting them. This is the practice behind Lindley Mill's Super Sprout whole grain wheat flour. The whole grain is preserved, ensuring that you receive the vitamins and minerals the wheat contains. But it's also sprouted, so that you can actually absorb and digest those nutrients. And, like all Lindley Mills products, it's organic - so you don't need to worry about pesticides.

This is something you won't find in a big box store. Luckily for us, we have a historic local mill (Lindley Mills is a 9th generation mill!) that's within a 20-minute drive from the farm. I feel fortunate that we can access such high-quality food within our small community.

We tend to take a middle path when it comes to all-purpose flour (refined flour) and super sprout whole grain flour. It's often difficult to substitute whole grain wheat flour in recipes because of its density - there's a reason why people wanted refined flour, after all. So we use both. For most recipes, I use all-purpose, and substitute a small amount of sprouted whole grain wheat. That way, I'm able to add in more nutrients, without comprising the final product.

Want to experiment with incorporating sprouted whole grain wheat in your kitchen? Here are three of our favorite recipes, each of which include some sprouted whole grain wheat flour:

I'd love for you to try them and tell me what you think! And, of course, I hope you try our Lindley Mills flour for yourself - and see the difference.

nutrition

More from the blog

Can we care about animals - and still raise them for food?

I probably spend the most time with the pigs on our farm. Part of this is practical: since pigs can’t sweat, we spray them down twice a day to help them wallow in the mud and stay cool.  But part of it is emotional, too. I enjoy being around the pigs. When there’s a lot on my mind, or I’ve spent too much time on the computer and need to get outside, wandering over to that week’s pig paddock is one of the ways I can clear my mind.  Pigs are highly emotive and responsive. When I spray them down with the hose, they like to sit back on their haunches, prick back their ears, and snap playfully at the water as it showers down on them. And then joyfully roll around in the mud afterward, of course.  But they’re responsive to humans in general, too. They are naturally curious and, in the case of our heritage breed Red Wattles, gentle. They’ll come up and sniff you, rub their mud-streaked bellies over you, and let you scratch their ears.  And maybe this is the part where you start to wonder: But aren’t you raising them for food?  Why would you want an emotional connection to an animal that you are raising for food?  I understand where this question is coming from. I was a vegetarian for nearly a decade because I didn’t like the thought of killing animals, especially within the framework of our industrial food system.  But actually, it isn’t a problem or moral quandary for me. Yes, we grow fond of and attached to our animals, including our pigs.  Yes, we still send them to the butcher or process them on our farm for food. And yes, this still makes sense to me.  I would gently suggest that the idea that we shouldn’t have any emotional connection to our food - that we can only eat meat that comes from animals we withhold our emotions or affection from - is a sign of our disconnection to the way food is grown.  That is, after all, one of the premises of industrial agriculture. Designate animals with one sole purpose - “becoming food” - and then shut them away in buildings, cramped quarters, or far away from humans who might interact with them beyond the farmer.  And the farmer, too, should be as disconnected as possible. After all, this is an efficient machine.  The problem, from a regenerative perspective, is that growing food is never just about growing food. Food is the gift you receive at the end of your work, but it’s the work itself - and the consequences of the work beyond the food - that is the point.  The work, on our farm, is caring for the land. That means working alongside animals to nurture native plants, clear forest areas to make existing trees healthier, and create habitats for birds, pollinators, and wildlife.  And that means becoming attentive and thoughtful - to animals and to the land. Watching, learning, and yes, developing bonds with the habitats you’re nurturing and the animals that are helping you do so.  Is it sad to load up animals and take them to the butcher at the end of the season? Yes, it often can be. But I don’t feel guilty about it. I know that we’ve given them the best life possible, and that we’ve partnered with them to leave our farm better than we found it each year.  And if that doesn’t make sense, that’s okay. I’m not saying that everyone has to agree with me. I’d simply like to advocate for a way of farming and consuming meat that includes this experience - one of affection and bonding between animals and humans.  After all, this is one of the many ways we try to do things differently on our farm. We don’t want to just provide you with food that meets your standards - non-GMO, no vaccines, no antibiotics, grass-fed and pasture-raised.  We also want to help you reconnect with that food. And part of that is knowing the animals, hearing stories about them, and yes, maybe even having an emotional connection with them, despite the end goal of providing meat to you.